David Urquhart

The Spring Circuit Court of Dundee commenced on the 19th of April 1883, amid great anticipation and ceremony, with Lord Mure presiding. Among the cases presented, none were more distressing than that of David Urquhart. He stood accused of a heinous crime – the murder of his illegitimate daughter, Elizabeth Meffan, aged approximately two years and six months. The indictment detailed the horrifying nature of the assault, alleging that David had viciously attacked and abused Elizabeth, causing her mortal injuries that led to her immediate or subsequent death. It further contended that David had previously shown malice and ill-will towards the young girl.

The testimonies presented in court were deeply harrowing, none more so than that of Isabella Meffan, the mother of David’s three illegitimate children. Isabella recounted the events of the fateful day, stating that she and David had gone out for drinks and shopping, during which David had purchased toys for their children. Isabella returned to their shared residence in Hilltown, while David continued drinking. Upon his return home, Isabella, fearing his potential mistreatment, sought refuge at a neighbour’s house, spending the night there. In the early morning, upon hearing David leave their home, she cautiously returned, only to be confronted with a horrifying sight.

The front door stood wide open, and her two other children lay on her bed instead of their usual hammock. It was then that they informed her of Elizabeth’s tragic demise. The lifeless body of her beloved daughter lay in the hammock, sending waves of anguish through Isabella’s heart. With a heavy heart and trembling voice, Isabella detailed the relentless abuse inflicted upon the 30-month-old Elizabeth, including striking, whipping, and forcing her to carry a brick back and forth across the room.

Tragically, David’s wrath did not spare their other two children, as they too endured his violence while helplessly witnessing their sister’s suffering. According to the children’s account, David had washed away the blood from Elizabeth’s battered body before placing her in the hammock and departing the home. Dr. Templeman, who conducted the post-mortem examination, confirmed the presence of washed blood on Elizabeth’s body. The cause of death was attributed to haemorrhage of the abdomen resulting from a ruptured liver caused by physical violence.

David’s defence argued that he had no recollection of the events due to intoxication, claiming that waking up to find Elizabeth dead in the hammock was his only memory. Witnesses testified to David’s drunken behaviour on the night of the incident, further supporting his claim of being inebriated. However, John Riley, an acquaintance of David, recounted a chilling statement made by David on the morning of the 27th of February, just before he turned himself in to the police. According to John, David allegedly uttered, “I have killed my little girl…I think I kicked her to death.”

Despite admitting to the abuse and mistreatment, Mr. Hay, David Urquhart’s advocate, appealed to the jury for leniency. He argued that the tragic events were an accident born out of a desire to punish, rather than a premeditated act of murder. Mr. Hay implored the jury to consider the delicate balance between punishment and remorse that now defined David’s life. As Mr. Hay concluded his appeal, the courtroom erupted in applause from the gallery.

After deliberating for a mere 10 minutes, the jury rendered their verdict. By a narrow majority of 8 to 7, David Urquhart was found not guilty of murder but guilty of culpable homicide. Instead of facing the death penalty, David was sentenced to 21 years of imprisonment in the Dundee prison.

The case of David Urquhart’s trial and its outcome brought attention to several significant facts surrounding the case. One notable detail was the involvement of Dr. Templeman, who performed the post-mortem examination alongside Dr. Anderson. Their findings provided critical evidence that supported the prosecution’s claims of physical violence and ultimately helped establish the cause of Elizabeth’s untimely death.

The opening of the Spring Circuit Court of Justiciary itself was a highly anticipated event, marked by a grand display of ceremonial proceedings. Lord Mure’s arrival, accompanied by the band of the 1st F.R.V. and an honour guard of the same regiment, created an atmosphere of solemnity and importance within the crowded courtroom. The presence of notable figures, such as Sheriff Cheyne, Mr. Ross, Sheriff Clerk of Forfarshire, and Provost Moncur, added further gravity to the proceedings.

This tragic case also shed light on societal attitudes of the time, particularly regarding illegitimate children and the stigma associated with them. Isabella Meffan’s testimony and her relationship with David Urquhart highlighted the challenges faced by unmarried parents and the difficult choices they often had to make. The court’s recognition that children under the age of 14 could provide evidence, albeit unsworn, demonstrated a growing acknowledgment of a child’s capacity to contribute to legal proceedings.

Historically, the case of David Urquhart stood as a reminder of the extreme measures some individuals were driven to conceal the shame and social ostracization associated with illegitimate children. Infanticide and abandonment were distressing realities that were tragically prevalent in societies where societal judgment weighed heavily upon families.

With the conclusion of the trial, David Urquhart was sentenced to 21 years of imprisonment in the Dundee prison. The jury’s decision reflected a delicate balance between recognizing the severity of the crime committed and acknowledging the mitigating circumstances presented by the defence. The trial of David Urquhart during the Spring Circuit Court of Dundee in 1883 captivated public attention with its shocking allegations and distressing testimonies.

Dundee Prison on Bell St in 1928, just before demolishion.

The case underscored the importance of forensic evidence, the role of witness testimonies, and the evolving understanding of children’s participation in legal proceedings. It also shed light on societal attitudes towards illegitimate children and the devastating consequences of social stigma.

– DD Tours operates walking tours in Dundee city, covering dark local history such as wars, battles, murders, diseases, riots, disasters and executions. Walk with us for an unforgettable storytelling experience.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from DD TOURS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading